Занятость лиц с инвалидностью: возможности, приоритеты и результаты активной политики в государствах благосостояния. Часть вторая
Научная статья
Для цитирования
Кулагина Е. В. Занятость лиц с инвалидностью: возможности, приоритеты и результаты активной политики в государствах благосостояния. Часть вторая. — Социологическая наука и социальная практика, 2025. Т. 13. № 1. С. 117-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2025.13.1.6. EDN: TPZPTA
Аннотация
В статье, состоящей из двух частей, рассматривается активная политика занятости в государствах благосостояния и её влияние на положение лиц с инвалидностью трудоспособного возраста. На базе материалов научных исследований и данных опросов населения в странах ЕС и ОЭСР проанализированы тенденции активной политики занятости в отношении лиц с умеренными и серьёзными нарушениями в государствах благосостояния разных моделей за период с 2010 по 2020 г. Во второй части статьи раскрыты подходы активной политики к выбору приоритетных групп граждан с инвалидностью для направления социальных инвестиций при содействии труду, к перераспределению обязанностей в сторону работодателей в традиционных формах занятости: специальных мастерских и системах квотирования рабочих мест, к обеспечению социальных гарантий в условиях дерегулирования рынка труда. Показаны ресурсы традиционных форм занятости, предпочтения работников и работодателей, влияющие на расширение возможностей трудоустройства. Рассмотрен потенциал мер активной политики в вопросах найма работников с разной степенью нарушений и сокращения безработицы, а также устойчивость результатов закрепления на рынке труда. Раскрыты формы и условия занятости лиц с инвалидностью в условиях дерегулирования рынка труда, факторы качества рабочих мест и уровень социальных гарантий. Представлены результаты активной политики в достижении самодостаточности при переходе от социального обеспечения к труду и оценка их устойчивости.
Ключевые слова:
государство благосостояния, новая социальная политика, переход от социального обеспечения к труду, активная политика занятости в отношении инвалидов, разрыв занятости лиц с инвалидностью, социальные гарантии в сфере занятости, инвалидность, неравенство
Литература
1. Grammenos St. European comparative data on Europe 2020 and persons with disabilities. Labour market, education, poverty and health analysis and trends. European Commission. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. DOI 10.2767/745317.
2. Disability, Work and Inclusion. Mainstreaming in All Policies and Practices. Paris : OECD, 2022. DOI 10.1787/1eaa5e9c-en.
3. Zukunft der Werkstätten – Perspektiven für und von Menschen mit Behinderung zwischen Teilhabe-Auftrag und Mindestlohn / Hrsg. : V. Schachler, W. Schlummer, R.Weber. Bad
Heilbrunn : Verlag Julius Klinkhardt; Lebenshilfe Verlag der Bundesvereinigung, 2023. 333 р. DOI 10.25656/01:26510.
4. Characteristics of individuals receiving disability benefits in the Netherlands and predictors of leaving the disability benefit scheme: a retrospective cohort study with five-year follow-up / I. Louwerse, M. A. Huysmans, H. J. van Rijssen [et al.] // BMC Public Health. 2018. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 157. DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5068-7.
5. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. A Synthesis of Findings across OECD countries. Paris : OECD, 2010. 166 p. DOI 10.1787/9789264088856-en.
6. Lillestø B., Sandvin J. T. Limits to vocational inclusion?: Disability and the social democratic conception of labour // Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 2014, Vol. 16, № 01. Р. 45–58. DOI 10.1080/15017419.2012.735203.
7. Grammenos St. European comparative data on Europe 2020 & People with disabilities. 2013. URL: https://includ-ed.eu/sites/default/files/documents/aned_2013_task_6_-_comparative_data_synthesis_report_-_europe2020_final.pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
8. Grammenos St. European comparative data on persons with disabilities. Equal opportunities, fair working conditions, social protection and inclusion, health analysis and trends – Data 2020, European Commission. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. DOI 10.2767/67323.
9. Dengler K. Effectiveness of Active Labour Market Programmes on the Job Quality of Welfare Recipients in Germany // Journal of Social Policy. 2019. Vol. 48, № 4. Р. 807–838. DOI 10.1017/S0047279419000114.
10. Albinowski M., Magda I., Rozszczypala A. The Employment Effect of the Disability Education Gap in Europe. Bonn : IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, 2024. 24 р. DOI 10.1080/096 45292.2024.2395564.
11. Lo S. H., Ville Is. The “employability” of disabled people in France: A labile and speculative notion to be tested against the empirical data from the 2008 “Handicap-Santé” study // ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research. 2013. Vol. 7, № 4. Р. 227–243. DOI 10.1016/j.alter.2013.09.007.
12. Reasonable Accommodation and Sheltered Workshops for People with Disabilities: Costs and Returns of Investments. Brussels European Union. European Parlament. 2015. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536295/IPOL_STU(2015)536295_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
13. Fostering Employment through Sheltered Workshops: Reality, Trends and Next Steps / L. Bezzina , J. Žutautaitė, F. Belafatti, E. Paulauskaitė. Brussels European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities (EASPD). 2022. URL: https://easpd.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Fostering_Employment_through_Sheltered_Workshops_Reality__Trends_and_Next_Steps_2.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
14. Behinderung & Beruf und soziale Entschädigung. BIH-Jahresbericht 2020–2021. Hürth: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Integrationsämter und Hauptfürsorgestellen (BIH). 2021. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/BIH_Jahresbericht_2021_barrierefrei_pdf-ua. pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
15. Entwicklung der Zugangszahlen zu Werkstätten für behinderte Menschen: im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales / W. Detmar, M. Gehrmann, F. König [et al.]. Berlin : Gesellschaft für Integration, Sozialforschung und Betriebspädagogik (ISB) gGmbH. 2008. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-342577 (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
16. Flüter-Hoffmann Chr., Kurtenacker A., Schmidt J. Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Erwerbsbeteiligung, Beschäftigungsstrukturen und persönliche Einschätzungen. IW-Analysen 147. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. 2021. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Analysen_147_Teilhabe-4.pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
17. Metzler Chr., Werner D. Die Erwerbssituation von Menschen mit Behinderung // IWTrends. 2017. Vol. 44, № 4. Р. 21–38.
18. Greve B. The labour market situation of disabled people in European countries and implementation of employment policies: a summary of evidence from country reports and research studies. April 2009. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/empl_portal/ede/ANED%20Task%206%20final%20report%20-%20final%20version%2017-04-09.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
19. Employment Outlook 2009. Tackling the Jobs Crisis. Paris : OECD, 2009. DOI 10.1787/empl_outlook-2009-en.
20. Mattern L., Rambausek-Haß T., Wansing G. Das Budget für Arbeit: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie zu seiner Umsetzung – Teil II: Ausgestaltung und sozialversicherungsrechtliche Fragestellungen. 2021. URL: https://www.reha-recht.de/fileadmin/user_upload/RehaRecht/Diskussionsforen/Forum_D/2021/D10-2021_Das_Budget_f%C3%BCr_Arbeit_Teil_II.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
21. Bambra C., Whitehead M., Hamilton V. Does “welfare-to-work” work? A systematic review of the effectiveness of the UK’s welfare-to-work programmes for people with a disability or chronic illness // Social Science and Medicine. 2005. Vol. 60, № 9. Р. 1905–1918. DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.002.
22. Promoting Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities. Quota Schemes. Vol. 1. International Labour Organization. 2019. URL: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_735531.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
23. Fuchs M. Quota Systems for Disabled Persons: Parameters, Aspects, Effectivity. Policy Brief. 2014. Vienna: European Centre. URL: https://www.euro.centre.org/downloads/detail/1459/1 (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
24. Richard S., Hennekam S. When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France // Work Employment and Society. 2020. Vol. 35, № 5. DOI 10.1177/0950017020946672.
25. Bambra C. Form Quotas to Sanction: The Political Economy of Rehabilitation in UK // New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives / Eds. I. Haarslof, I. Poulser, K. Larsen. Singapore : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Р. 69–96. DOI 10.1007/978981-13-7346-6.
26. Kubin T., Tratt B. Aktuelle Ausbildungs- und Beschäftigungssituation von Menschen mit Behinderung im Handwerk. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. München : Deutsche Handwerkinstitut, 2023. URL: https://lfi-muenchen.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Aktuelle-Ausbildungs-und-Beschaeftigungssituation-von-MiB-im-HW. pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
27. Geiger B. В. Benefits conditionality for disabled people: stylised facts from a review of international evidence and practice // Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. 2017. Vol. 25, № 2. Р. 107–28. DOI 10.1332/175982717X14939739331010.
28. Work, welfare, and wellbeing: The impacts of welfare conditionality on people with mental health impairments in the UK / P. Dwyer, L. Scullion, K. Jones [et al.] // Social Policy & Administration. 2020. Vol. 54, № 2. Р. 311–326. DOI 10.1111/spol.12560.
29. Gjersøe H. M. Regulating inflow or outflow: a comparison of the work capability assessments in the UK and Norway // Journal of Social Policy. 2015. Vol. 45, № 1. Р. 141–158. DOI 10.1017/S0047279415000471.
30. Fichtl A. Mini- and Midi-Job in Germany. Effects of Marginal Employment on Une mployment // FORES Policy Paper. 2015. № 3. Р. 01–54. URL: https://fores.se/publikation/mini-and-midi-jobs-in-germany/ (дата обращения: 27.10.2024).
31. Disability and employment – lessons from reforms / Eds. M. Kautto, J. Bach-Othman. Helsinki : Helsinki Finnish Centre for Pensions, 2010. 85 p. ISBN 978-951-691-132-1.
32. Fothergil S. Welfare-to-work isn’t working // People, Place and Policy. 2013. Vol. 7, № 2. Р. 61–65. DOI 10.3351/ppp.0007.0002.0002.
33. Graf T., Rudolph H. Dynamik im SGB II 2005–2007. Viele Bedarfsgemeinschaften bleiben lange bedürftig, IAB-Kurzbericht 05/2009, Nuremberg.
34. Gaskarth G. The Hartz Reforms ...and their lesson for the UK. Centre for Policy Studies. 2014. URL: https://cps.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/141024133732-TheHartzReforms.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
35. Parker S., Cass B. New Paradigms of Disability in Social Security Law and Policy in Australia: Implications for Participation // Disability Studies Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 25, № 4. Р. 1–26. DOI 10.18061/dsq.v25i4.621.
36. Edmiston D. Welfare, Austerity and Social Citizenship in the UK // Social Policy and Society. 2016. Vol. 16, № 2. Р. 261–270. DOI 10.1017/S1474746416000531.
37. Black D., Daniel K., Sanders S. The impact of economic conditions on participation in disability programs: Evidence from the coal boom and bust // The American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 92, № 1. Р. 27–50. DOI 10.1257/000282802760015595.
38. Rauch A., Dornette J. Equal Rights and Equal Duties? Activating Labour Market Policy and the Participation of Long-term Unemployed People with Disabilities after the Reform of the German Welfare State // Journal of Social Policy. 2010. Vol. 39, № 01. Р. 53–70. DOI 10.1017/S0047279409990419.
39. Bound J., Burkhauser R. V. Economic Analysis of Transfer Programs Targeted on People with Disabilities // Handbook of Labor Economics / Eds. O. Ashenfelter, D. Card. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1999. Vol. 3, P. C. P. 3417–3528. DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30042-0.
40. Welfare reform in European countries: a microsimulation analysis / H. Immervoll, H. J. Kleven, C. Th. Kreiner [et al.] // The Economic Journal. 2007. Vol. 117, № 516. Р. 1–44. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02000.x.
41. Burchardt T. The Dynamics of Being Disabled // Journal of Social Policy. 2000. Vol. 29, № 04. Р. 645–668. DOI 10.1017/S0047279400006097.
42. Labour market policies (LMP) in the European Union in 2019. A statistical analysis. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. 41 р. ISBN 978-92-7699673-6. DOI 10.2767/472792.
43. Carcillo S., Grubb D. From Inactivity to Work: The Role of Active Labour Market Policies // OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working P. 36. Paris : OECD, 2006. 72 p. DOI 10.1787/687686456188.
44. Haverman R., Wolfe B. The economics of disability and disability policy // Handbook of Health Economics / Eds. A. J. Culyer, J. P. Newhouse. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000. Vol. 1. Р. 995–1051. DOI 10.1016/S1574-0064(00)80031-1.
45. Кулагина Е. В. Активная политика занятости в отношении лиц с инвалидностью // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2023. Т. 11, № 4. С. 78–111. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.4. EDN HRCKWN. [Kulagina E. V. Active market labour policies towards people with disabilities. Sociological science and social practice=Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. 2023;11(4):78–111. (In Russ.)]. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.4.
46. Taylor-Gooby P., Gumy J. M., Otto A. Can “New Welfare” address poverty through more and better jobs? // Journal of Social Policy. 2014. Vol. 44. № 1. Р. 83–104. DOI 10.1017/S0047279414000403.
47. To what extent have relaxed eligibility requirements and increased generosity of disability benefits acted as disincentives for employment? A systematic review of evidence from countries with well-developed welfare systems / B. Barr, S. Clayton, M. Whitehead [et al.] // Epidemiology & Community Health. 2010. Vol. 64, № 12. Р. 1106–1114. DOI 10.1136/jech.2010.111401.
48. Hancock R, Berthoud R. Disability benefits and paying for care. ISER Working Paper Series from Institute for Social and Economic Research 2008. № 40. URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2008-40.pdf (дата обращения: 17.10.2024).
49. Pignatti C., Van Belle E. Better together: Active and passive labour market policies in developed and developing economies. International Labour Oganisation. Working Paper № 37. December 2018. URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_660003.pdf (дата обращения: 29.08.2023).
2. Disability, Work and Inclusion. Mainstreaming in All Policies and Practices. Paris : OECD, 2022. DOI 10.1787/1eaa5e9c-en.
3. Zukunft der Werkstätten – Perspektiven für und von Menschen mit Behinderung zwischen Teilhabe-Auftrag und Mindestlohn / Hrsg. : V. Schachler, W. Schlummer, R.Weber. Bad
Heilbrunn : Verlag Julius Klinkhardt; Lebenshilfe Verlag der Bundesvereinigung, 2023. 333 р. DOI 10.25656/01:26510.
4. Characteristics of individuals receiving disability benefits in the Netherlands and predictors of leaving the disability benefit scheme: a retrospective cohort study with five-year follow-up / I. Louwerse, M. A. Huysmans, H. J. van Rijssen [et al.] // BMC Public Health. 2018. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 157. DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5068-7.
5. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. A Synthesis of Findings across OECD countries. Paris : OECD, 2010. 166 p. DOI 10.1787/9789264088856-en.
6. Lillestø B., Sandvin J. T. Limits to vocational inclusion?: Disability and the social democratic conception of labour // Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 2014, Vol. 16, № 01. Р. 45–58. DOI 10.1080/15017419.2012.735203.
7. Grammenos St. European comparative data on Europe 2020 & People with disabilities. 2013. URL: https://includ-ed.eu/sites/default/files/documents/aned_2013_task_6_-_comparative_data_synthesis_report_-_europe2020_final.pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
8. Grammenos St. European comparative data on persons with disabilities. Equal opportunities, fair working conditions, social protection and inclusion, health analysis and trends – Data 2020, European Commission. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. DOI 10.2767/67323.
9. Dengler K. Effectiveness of Active Labour Market Programmes on the Job Quality of Welfare Recipients in Germany // Journal of Social Policy. 2019. Vol. 48, № 4. Р. 807–838. DOI 10.1017/S0047279419000114.
10. Albinowski M., Magda I., Rozszczypala A. The Employment Effect of the Disability Education Gap in Europe. Bonn : IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, 2024. 24 р. DOI 10.1080/096 45292.2024.2395564.
11. Lo S. H., Ville Is. The “employability” of disabled people in France: A labile and speculative notion to be tested against the empirical data from the 2008 “Handicap-Santé” study // ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research. 2013. Vol. 7, № 4. Р. 227–243. DOI 10.1016/j.alter.2013.09.007.
12. Reasonable Accommodation and Sheltered Workshops for People with Disabilities: Costs and Returns of Investments. Brussels European Union. European Parlament. 2015. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536295/IPOL_STU(2015)536295_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
13. Fostering Employment through Sheltered Workshops: Reality, Trends and Next Steps / L. Bezzina , J. Žutautaitė, F. Belafatti, E. Paulauskaitė. Brussels European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities (EASPD). 2022. URL: https://easpd.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Fostering_Employment_through_Sheltered_Workshops_Reality__Trends_and_Next_Steps_2.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
14. Behinderung & Beruf und soziale Entschädigung. BIH-Jahresbericht 2020–2021. Hürth: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Integrationsämter und Hauptfürsorgestellen (BIH). 2021. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/BIH_Jahresbericht_2021_barrierefrei_pdf-ua. pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
15. Entwicklung der Zugangszahlen zu Werkstätten für behinderte Menschen: im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales / W. Detmar, M. Gehrmann, F. König [et al.]. Berlin : Gesellschaft für Integration, Sozialforschung und Betriebspädagogik (ISB) gGmbH. 2008. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-342577 (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
16. Flüter-Hoffmann Chr., Kurtenacker A., Schmidt J. Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Erwerbsbeteiligung, Beschäftigungsstrukturen und persönliche Einschätzungen. IW-Analysen 147. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. 2021. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Analysen_147_Teilhabe-4.pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
17. Metzler Chr., Werner D. Die Erwerbssituation von Menschen mit Behinderung // IWTrends. 2017. Vol. 44, № 4. Р. 21–38.
18. Greve B. The labour market situation of disabled people in European countries and implementation of employment policies: a summary of evidence from country reports and research studies. April 2009. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/empl_portal/ede/ANED%20Task%206%20final%20report%20-%20final%20version%2017-04-09.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
19. Employment Outlook 2009. Tackling the Jobs Crisis. Paris : OECD, 2009. DOI 10.1787/empl_outlook-2009-en.
20. Mattern L., Rambausek-Haß T., Wansing G. Das Budget für Arbeit: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie zu seiner Umsetzung – Teil II: Ausgestaltung und sozialversicherungsrechtliche Fragestellungen. 2021. URL: https://www.reha-recht.de/fileadmin/user_upload/RehaRecht/Diskussionsforen/Forum_D/2021/D10-2021_Das_Budget_f%C3%BCr_Arbeit_Teil_II.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
21. Bambra C., Whitehead M., Hamilton V. Does “welfare-to-work” work? A systematic review of the effectiveness of the UK’s welfare-to-work programmes for people with a disability or chronic illness // Social Science and Medicine. 2005. Vol. 60, № 9. Р. 1905–1918. DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.002.
22. Promoting Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities. Quota Schemes. Vol. 1. International Labour Organization. 2019. URL: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_735531.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
23. Fuchs M. Quota Systems for Disabled Persons: Parameters, Aspects, Effectivity. Policy Brief. 2014. Vienna: European Centre. URL: https://www.euro.centre.org/downloads/detail/1459/1 (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
24. Richard S., Hennekam S. When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France // Work Employment and Society. 2020. Vol. 35, № 5. DOI 10.1177/0950017020946672.
25. Bambra C. Form Quotas to Sanction: The Political Economy of Rehabilitation in UK // New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives / Eds. I. Haarslof, I. Poulser, K. Larsen. Singapore : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Р. 69–96. DOI 10.1007/978981-13-7346-6.
26. Kubin T., Tratt B. Aktuelle Ausbildungs- und Beschäftigungssituation von Menschen mit Behinderung im Handwerk. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. München : Deutsche Handwerkinstitut, 2023. URL: https://lfi-muenchen.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Aktuelle-Ausbildungs-und-Beschaeftigungssituation-von-MiB-im-HW. pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
27. Geiger B. В. Benefits conditionality for disabled people: stylised facts from a review of international evidence and practice // Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. 2017. Vol. 25, № 2. Р. 107–28. DOI 10.1332/175982717X14939739331010.
28. Work, welfare, and wellbeing: The impacts of welfare conditionality on people with mental health impairments in the UK / P. Dwyer, L. Scullion, K. Jones [et al.] // Social Policy & Administration. 2020. Vol. 54, № 2. Р. 311–326. DOI 10.1111/spol.12560.
29. Gjersøe H. M. Regulating inflow or outflow: a comparison of the work capability assessments in the UK and Norway // Journal of Social Policy. 2015. Vol. 45, № 1. Р. 141–158. DOI 10.1017/S0047279415000471.
30. Fichtl A. Mini- and Midi-Job in Germany. Effects of Marginal Employment on Une mployment // FORES Policy Paper. 2015. № 3. Р. 01–54. URL: https://fores.se/publikation/mini-and-midi-jobs-in-germany/ (дата обращения: 27.10.2024).
31. Disability and employment – lessons from reforms / Eds. M. Kautto, J. Bach-Othman. Helsinki : Helsinki Finnish Centre for Pensions, 2010. 85 p. ISBN 978-951-691-132-1.
32. Fothergil S. Welfare-to-work isn’t working // People, Place and Policy. 2013. Vol. 7, № 2. Р. 61–65. DOI 10.3351/ppp.0007.0002.0002.
33. Graf T., Rudolph H. Dynamik im SGB II 2005–2007. Viele Bedarfsgemeinschaften bleiben lange bedürftig, IAB-Kurzbericht 05/2009, Nuremberg.
34. Gaskarth G. The Hartz Reforms ...and their lesson for the UK. Centre for Policy Studies. 2014. URL: https://cps.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/141024133732-TheHartzReforms.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
35. Parker S., Cass B. New Paradigms of Disability in Social Security Law and Policy in Australia: Implications for Participation // Disability Studies Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 25, № 4. Р. 1–26. DOI 10.18061/dsq.v25i4.621.
36. Edmiston D. Welfare, Austerity and Social Citizenship in the UK // Social Policy and Society. 2016. Vol. 16, № 2. Р. 261–270. DOI 10.1017/S1474746416000531.
37. Black D., Daniel K., Sanders S. The impact of economic conditions on participation in disability programs: Evidence from the coal boom and bust // The American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 92, № 1. Р. 27–50. DOI 10.1257/000282802760015595.
38. Rauch A., Dornette J. Equal Rights and Equal Duties? Activating Labour Market Policy and the Participation of Long-term Unemployed People with Disabilities after the Reform of the German Welfare State // Journal of Social Policy. 2010. Vol. 39, № 01. Р. 53–70. DOI 10.1017/S0047279409990419.
39. Bound J., Burkhauser R. V. Economic Analysis of Transfer Programs Targeted on People with Disabilities // Handbook of Labor Economics / Eds. O. Ashenfelter, D. Card. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1999. Vol. 3, P. C. P. 3417–3528. DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30042-0.
40. Welfare reform in European countries: a microsimulation analysis / H. Immervoll, H. J. Kleven, C. Th. Kreiner [et al.] // The Economic Journal. 2007. Vol. 117, № 516. Р. 1–44. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02000.x.
41. Burchardt T. The Dynamics of Being Disabled // Journal of Social Policy. 2000. Vol. 29, № 04. Р. 645–668. DOI 10.1017/S0047279400006097.
42. Labour market policies (LMP) in the European Union in 2019. A statistical analysis. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. 41 р. ISBN 978-92-7699673-6. DOI 10.2767/472792.
43. Carcillo S., Grubb D. From Inactivity to Work: The Role of Active Labour Market Policies // OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working P. 36. Paris : OECD, 2006. 72 p. DOI 10.1787/687686456188.
44. Haverman R., Wolfe B. The economics of disability and disability policy // Handbook of Health Economics / Eds. A. J. Culyer, J. P. Newhouse. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000. Vol. 1. Р. 995–1051. DOI 10.1016/S1574-0064(00)80031-1.
45. Кулагина Е. В. Активная политика занятости в отношении лиц с инвалидностью // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2023. Т. 11, № 4. С. 78–111. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.4. EDN HRCKWN. [Kulagina E. V. Active market labour policies towards people with disabilities. Sociological science and social practice=Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. 2023;11(4):78–111. (In Russ.)]. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.4.
46. Taylor-Gooby P., Gumy J. M., Otto A. Can “New Welfare” address poverty through more and better jobs? // Journal of Social Policy. 2014. Vol. 44. № 1. Р. 83–104. DOI 10.1017/S0047279414000403.
47. To what extent have relaxed eligibility requirements and increased generosity of disability benefits acted as disincentives for employment? A systematic review of evidence from countries with well-developed welfare systems / B. Barr, S. Clayton, M. Whitehead [et al.] // Epidemiology & Community Health. 2010. Vol. 64, № 12. Р. 1106–1114. DOI 10.1136/jech.2010.111401.
48. Hancock R, Berthoud R. Disability benefits and paying for care. ISER Working Paper Series from Institute for Social and Economic Research 2008. № 40. URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2008-40.pdf (дата обращения: 17.10.2024).
49. Pignatti C., Van Belle E. Better together: Active and passive labour market policies in developed and developing economies. International Labour Oganisation. Working Paper № 37. December 2018. URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_660003.pdf (дата обращения: 29.08.2023).
Статья
Поступила: 01.11.2024
Опубликована: 23.03.2025
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
Harvard
Кулагина, Е. В. (2025) ’Занятость лиц с инвалидностью: возможности, приоритеты и результаты активной политики в государствах благосостояния. Часть вторая’, Социологическая наука и социальная практика, 13(1), сс. 117-141. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2025.13.1.6.
Раздел
СОЦИОЛОГИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ
